Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Ron Paul Is Right, FROTHY Santorum Is Fake



On tonight's final GOP Presidential debate on CNN Ron Paul made the obvious observation by calling homophobic Rick Santorum (aka FROTHY, if you wish to know the history behind his nickname google him) a fake. Not only did I enjoy the revelation but I enjoyed the delivery which was a swift confirmation by the Texas Congressman in front of FROTHY's face that yes in deed he is a fake during the debate tonight.

Ron Paul makes reference to FROTHY's voting record as being anything but conservative, which coming from that point any conservative can therefore agree to the obvious fact that Ron Paul has brought up. But I would like to also point out that FROTHY is only the symptom of this scam. It is the entire social conservative pillar that is obviously a farce beyond fraud.

Typical social conservatives describe themselves as "conservatives" but as we have seen in the past they instead support non-conservative mandates such as a bigger Department of Education, massive funding for government healthcare, and the most obvious fraudulent move that social conservatives engage in is funding so-called "faith based initiative" programs, which under the guise of proclaiming "freedom of religion" they turn around and subsidize religion with public federal funds and big bureaucracies, hardly a conservative virtue. Social conservatives also love to display religious relics on government property, not that there is anything wrong with the relics themselves, its just that these actions typify how social conservatives want government sanction and approval of their supposed religious beliefs, yet scorn at other religious beliefs even though quite ironically they harp all day about "freedom of religion." If they were to encourage and allow ALL faiths and non-faith to display their beliefs on government property then I would not have a problem with this and and their claim of supposed religious freedom would have some cred.

The other hypocritical aspect of social conservatives like FROTHY is that they are all "about the family." In fact the word "family" is part of FROTHY's campaign slogan. But what is "family" anyway? While one can take our time to dispense an appropiate answer, FROTHY and his ilk have one already up their sleeves: a family is anything but gay. Meaning that the use of the word "family" is not about strengthening the family and all families, but to make anti-gay homophobic rhetoric sound nice and non-judgmental, much like how the racist would say its about protecting the white race while in deed the philosophy is all about breaking down blacks.

Clearly, FROTHY and company do not care about the family. Most social conservatives are against welfare or free healthcare for poor families (much needed resources to raise a family). The main reason why families breakdown is due to economic resources and the lack of social support. Social conservatives balk at the idea of welfare moms, but yet what else can these moms do? If she gets a job somebody needs to take care of the kids and this can become a problem, among other issues faced by single moms, dads and the like. I do wish that women make more practical decisions, but this is not a perfect world, and without actually open your eyes to reality and refuse to look at the entire picture then what we have to deal with are nothing but a bunch of drones that are wooed by one-liners and catch phrases. Family issues are serious issues, and social conservatives think that by stopping gays from getting married and fulfilling our lives that that would somehow make the problems less worse... which is total nonsense.

Social conservatives claim they have the answers, and they have been politically active for decades, yet I only see things getting worse for families. Forty some states have banned gay marriage, yet families are breaking down in those states anyway, so obviously gay marriage is not the problem. The problem is that these social conservatives who poised themselves as saviors and holy upright people are letting down their own straight society they claim to defend as they engage in fake crusades at the whim of a certain powerful foreign church and on the way disregarding families in need of help. To any objective person like myself, social conservatives do deserve the title of political fake pygmies.

No comments :

Post a Comment